case legislation Case regulation is regulation that is based on judicial decisions rather than law based on constitutions , statutes , or regulations . Case legislation concerns special disputes resolved by courts using the concrete facts of the case. By contrast, statutes and regulations are written abstractly. Case regulation, also used interchangeably with common regulation , refers back to the collection of precedents and authority established by previous judicial decisions over a particular issue or subject matter.
Article 199 of your Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other ample remedy is provided by legislation." It is actually nicely-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Individuals remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
10 . Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair to your offender along with the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court together with from other courts Nevertheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
This ruling has conditions, and Because the petitioners failed a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based around the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances in the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 in the Constitution. Read more
2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. Additionally they stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi models, with non-compliance struggling with departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, they are directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. twelve. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more
Generally speaking, higher courts tend not to have direct oversight over the decrease courts of record, in that they cannot achieve out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments on the decreased courts.
PLR can be a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is usually a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; Should the parents on the boy or Woman never approve of these kinds of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they could do if they're able to cut off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person that is a major, the couple is neither harassed by any one nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who presents these kinds of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings with the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against these person(s) as provided by law.
The DCFS social worker in charge of your boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, As well as in her six-month report to your court, the worker elaborated around the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to move him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
This Court may possibly interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the summary or finding is website which include no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may well interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mildew the relief to make it appropriate for the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. To the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified through the decision from the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
The police have the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a Court for cognizable offenses. The presence of this power casts an obligation over the police, they usually must bear in mind, as held by this Court from time to time in its numerous pronouncemnts, that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Primarily, the Police Officers are necessary to protect and never abduct. Read more
The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to get gathered by the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
Previous 4 tax years interpreted. It's not at all from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
The Court holds the authority to review any criminal or civil cases, aside from most civil cases in which the amount in controversy does not exceed $200. It also regulates the legal profession in Washington, and it's issued a Code of Judicial Conduct to guide the actions of state judges.